Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:13:40 -0500
From: txliberty@hotmail.com ("Terry L Parker")
Subject: [libs4peace] SuspectGovt
To: libs4peace@yahoogroups.com ( "Libertarians 4Peace"), hapearce@earthlink.net ("Howard Pearce" )
Irrational and shows ignorance of why govt is held to 'due process' Do
you, really wnat govt to ignore it own constitutionally required procedures
before killing people?
As I pointed out clearly in the forum, by govt neglecting the required
process for no apparent other reason, govt has brought suspicion upon
itself.
PeaceInTheHeartOfTexas,
Terry Liberty Parker
AustinVoiceCall 1.512.494.9176
Find 21st Century 'War & Peace' via
'Search' at: www.austin.indymedia.org
Confer at: www.topica.com/lists/LibertyGeneral
And, In Austin Every Sunday 7pm - ?
I host informal discussion of
current ideas & issues at
Hickory St Grill on 8th & Congress
http://profiles.yahoo.com/txliberty
Please consider signing petition at:
http://www.libertarians4peace.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Pearce" <hapearce@earthlink.net>
To: "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:03 PM
Subject: OFFLINE Re: [libs4peace] Fwd:Response to Carol Moore from Richard
Freedman
> 4/29/2002 2:11:16 PM, "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I don't know that bin Laden (bin forgotten) is an actual perp because no
> >credible evidence has been presented in the constitutionally provided
> >process. Since the administration did not adhere to this needed process
> >they seem to me as suspect as the alleged perps.
> >
>
> You mean that unless evidence is presented to you thru a specific legal
process
> then you cannot/willnot accept it for purposes of making a personal
judgement ?
>
> I can't count the times I have heard people tell me that I cannot draw
> conclussions on a persons guilt because I don't have proof beyond a
reasonable
> doubt.
> Neither you or I are part of a jury or other legal process that binds us
to such
> legalities when deciding what is or isn't true.
>
> The government (or others) may be derilict in their duties by not going
thru such
> a process in any particular case but that is clearly a separate process
that can
> be criticized on its own.
>
> Imagine the opposite situation when the government is trying to "get
someone off"
> so they decide not to present evidence in a legal fashion. Would the
government
> accomplish its objective since you would then have to claim that you had
no
> evidence on which to draw any firm conclussions ?
>
>
>
> Howard Pearce
> LP of MA
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/k6cvND/n97DAA/ySSFAA/nJ9qlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
If you continue to vote for the same policies, you will continue to get the same consequences because of those policies.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
libs4peace-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/